Sherlock, and how he doesn't have Asperger's, even if Cumberbatch said he did.

[laurajv]

movies_michelle was talking about Sherlock (check out the post, there are some awesome fic recs in it!!), and reminded me of something beatrice_otter said about Sherlock not having an autism spectrum disorder, so I went to look up that post while my kid was napping and it was about something else, really, but it did remind me of a book I got on beatrice_otter's recommendation -- So Odd A Mixture-- which contains a really good overview of autism spectrum disorders for laypersons. So I looked that up, too. And then my response got really long and obnoxious, so I moved it over here.

Sherlock certainly has things that could be superficially viewed as Asperger's, but what strikes me about the portrayal (and about the character in general, from Doyle onwards) is that -- ok, so I think, when most people think about the Sherlock portrayal as one of Asperger's, they are thinking of what movies_michelle talks about: "social isolation, acute focus on specific things at a time, and inability to socialize on what is generally considered a normal level". While those certainly exist (in all versions of the character, I think), they exist in plenty of people who don't have Asperger's, too, but have completely different issues, or no diagnosable issues at all. It's *how* those things fit into something that makes them an autism spectrum disorder.

Anyway, "So Odd a Mixture" has a handy-dandy list of 9 areas of difficulty that you tend to see, to one degree or another, in people on the autism spectrum: theory of mind (understanding that others think differently from oneself, understanding motives of others, etc), central coherence (understanding what details are important and how they impact the whole), executive function (complex planning), cognitive shifting (ability to shift focus), language processing, dyspraxia (motor impairments), awareness of the unwritten rules of conversation, interpretaton of non-verbal cues from facial expression and gestures, and sensory sensitivities.

Of those, I can only really see Sherlock (in any incarnation, not just this one) of having issues with cognitive shifting (he tends to focus intently and may not pay attention to peripheral information, though "The Great Game" in BBC Sherlock might argue against difficulty in this area for that particular version of Sherlock Holmes) and sensory sensitivities (it's certainly one plausible explanation for the character's ongoing physical disdain for women, though of course homosexuality or asexuality are alternate explanations).

Of the others -- if he had serious difficulties in any of them, he couldn't do what he does. What he does displays a deep, well-managed, coherent understanding of human motivations and of how details impact the whole.

He's bad with certain emotions (not understanding how someone could still be upset about a death that occurred years ago), but he does understand emotions in general. Even if he doesn't experience certain emotions himself, which he might not, he is clearly aware that other people have them and what effects different emotions might be expected to have upon those people's behavior.

Mostly, how he reads to me is as a bright, callous individual who really doesn't care much about other people. He does not read to me as a sociopath, though sociopathy I'm more willing to buy for the length of a story than I am an autism spectrum disorder.

Comments

[laurajv]

The manipulation there would argue for sociopathy, not against it, though.

But I think there are plenty of convincing arguments against sociopathy in the three episodes we have -- not least because the classically sociopathic behaviors he exhibits are not done for classically sociopathic reasons. (Ability to cry at will is apparently classically sociopathic, but doing it in order to gain something other than personal sympathy or pity is not, for example. Game-playing with humans as the pieces is sociopathic, but the willingness to play someone else's game is not. Moriarty, now, I think BBC's Moriarty is a sociopath in truth.)

[(Anonymous)]

*nods nods*
Also, he shows emotion when he is not looked at, and this is something you will never see a sociopath doing. He is also defensive, and again no sociopath would behave so (with John in the first episode, he was on defence the whole time). I think he wish to be a sociopath, but in truth isn't :)
I agree with Moriarty as a true sociopath, and he understands that Sherlock isn't one ("We both knows it isn't true")

T.T.

[(Anonymous)]

Hmm, yes, but he does describe himself as "high-functioning" which could be taken any way, really. I interpret it as meaning he has some, but not all, of the traits that would define someone as a sociopath. Also I think it was a more of an "Anderson, shut up" moment than a proper diagnosis.